Photo by Robert Lax
"Art is art. Everything else is everything else." - Ad Reinhardt
"Art is art. Everything else is everything else." - Ad Reinhardt
In other words, art does not represent something else. Art stands on its own, a living entity, in and of itself.
Reinhardt was a pioneer of conceptual and minimal art. He was a critic of abstract expressionism. Reinhardt’s earliest exhibited paintings avoided representation, and show a steady progression away from objects and external reference. He is best known for his Black paintings of the 1960s.
Ad Reinhardt, Merton and Lax were friends. They met while they were students at Columbia University in New York City. (Actually, Reinhart and Lax attended the same high school, but that's another story) Ad was studying art history at Columbia and frequently contributed cartoons to the school newspaper, Jester, where Merton and Lax were staffers.
The three were bonded by a common vision. A similar calling that centered around simplicity and emptiness. Though they each went their own way in the world, they never lost sight of each other.
"... I think Ad Reinhardt is possibly the best artist in America ... Reinhardt's abstract art is pure and religious. It flies away from all naturalism, from all representation ... " - Merton, 1940, "Run to the Mountain, page 128
Merton, Lax, and Reinhardt form a potent troika, forging into new territory. Continuing the "Beat" style of their youth, they are unusual, contrary to what is considered traditional or accepted, off the beaten track, outside the norm. Reinhardt's paintings remain controversial decades after they were composed. Lax's poetry is shocking in its simplicity and is still relatively unknown in America. Merton's writings are popular, but he was rejected for inclusion in the Catholic Catechism.
In the spring of 1959 Lax and Reinhardt visited Merton at Gethsemane. In his thank you note, Reinhardt says to Merton:
In fact, in 1962 Merton was taken with the art of William Congdon, an American painter, abstract expressionist and devout Catholic who focused on religious themes. Merton wrote a few paragraphs praising Congdon's work, and threw in a line condemning abstraction:
Like Lax and Reinhardt, Merton headed into the Unknown.
Ad Reinhardt died on August 30, 1967, of heart problems. He was 53 years old.
As a memorial to Reinhardt, Merton published in the first issue of his literary magazine, Monk's Pond, a chantlike text by Reinhardt, dating to 1962. Here is one verse of that text:
Sounds like God, doesn't it?
See also - does art have anything to do with life? (Robert Lax on Ad Reinhardt)
In the spring of 1959 Lax and Reinhardt visited Merton at Gethsemane. In his thank you note, Reinhardt says to Merton:
"... let's argue about art and religion some more. If you're doing a book on it, and you have a world-wide audience, can I help you say what's right, instead of saying things people want to hear and agree with? You just make people happy if you don't say what's right, true (beautiful?) ... thanks for the weekend."
In fact, in 1962 Merton was taken with the art of William Congdon, an American painter, abstract expressionist and devout Catholic who focused on religious themes. Merton wrote a few paragraphs praising Congdon's work, and threw in a line condemning abstraction:
"... here the dynamism of abstraction has been set free from its compulsive, Donysian and potentially orgiastic self-frustraion and raised to the level of spirituality." - Thomas Merton, jacket copy for William Congdon, In My Disc of Gold: Itinerary to Christ of William Congdon, 1962Well, Reinhardt soon caught wind of this and fired off to Merton a blistering letter, taking him to task for his poor judgement.
" ... I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw ... Why shouldn't you be human after all ... have you given up on hope? Have you no respect for sacredness and art? ... Are you throwing in the trowel at long last? Can't you tell your impasto from a holy ground? ... We'll send help, hold on, old man." - Ad Reinhardt letter to Merton, 1962Merton had the good sense to listen to Reinhardt's criticism. His reply, though superficially humerous, shows that Merton and Reinhardt were looking at each other, eye to eye, and this was a time of reckoning.
"Dear Ad,Merton decisively moved to Reinhardt's camp and the world of contemporary art. As an artist, he would not go back to his drawings of Our Lady. As an author, he would not turn medieval concepts to a task for which they were not suited.
"Once, twice, often, repeatedly, I have reached out for your letter and for the typewriter. Choked with sobs, or rather more often carried away by the futilities of life, I have desisted ...
"Truly immersed in the five skandhas and plunged in avidya, I have taken the shell for the nut and the nut for the nugget and the nugget for the essence and the essence for the such-ness ... I have embraced a bucket of schmaltz. I have accepted the mish mash of kitsch. I have been made public with a mitre of marshmallows upon my dumkopf. This is the price of folly and the wages of middle-aged perversity. I thought my friends would never know ... I am up to my neck. I am in the wash. I am under the mangle. I am publicly identified with all the idols. I am the byword of critics and galleries. I am eaten alive by the art racket. I am threatened with publication of a great book of horrors which I have despised and do recant." - Merton letter to Ad Reinhardt, 1962
Like Lax and Reinhardt, Merton headed into the Unknown.
Ad Reinhardt died on August 30, 1967, of heart problems. He was 53 years old.
[photo by Merton, cover of Monk's Pond 1st edition, spring 1968]
As a memorial to Reinhardt, Merton published in the first issue of his literary magazine, Monk's Pond, a chantlike text by Reinhardt, dating to 1962. Here is one verse of that text:
"The one object of fifty years of abstract art is to present art-as-art and as nothing else, to make it into the one thing it is only, separating and defining it more and more, making it purer and emptier, more absolute and more exclusive - non-objective, non-representational, non-figurative, non-imagist, non-expressionist, non-subjective. the only and one way to say what abstract art or art-as-art is, is to say what it is not." - Ad Reinhardt, Monk's Pond 1, Spring 1968, p. 6 first published in Art International, December 1962
Sounds like God, doesn't it?
See also - does art have anything to do with life? (Robert Lax on Ad Reinhardt)
As I dabble in art myself and especially the discipline of abstraction, I tend to agree with Ad Reinhardt. You have to go very deep within to do abstract art with any degree of honesty and quality. I'm nowhere near that yet, but I am learning how difficult that is.
ReplyDeleteGood to read that Merton recanted. Mind you, I never cared for Merton the self-conscious intellectual (as I perceived him at times).
I appreciate your comment, Barbara. Your artwork reminds me very much of Merton's later work with calligraphy and print-making. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteFascinating.
ReplyDeleteMy impression from this and other is that Merton had more an analytic than a synthetic mind (if it is not too analytic to put that form to it)and so would rather go back and forth than synthesize. for example 'art as art' and rublev and the make it new of the bauhaus and so on. my own ideal would be to have a black on black on one side of the church and
a rublev or something on the other.
this too is thou/neither is this thou. or like the temple dogs one
side with mouth open the other with
closed mouth etc
just these thoughts to this
+Seraphim Joseph Sigrist
thank you for your interesting thoughts, +seraphim. I kind of see what you are saying - neither this nor that, both, but not that either.
ReplyDeleteReinhart was surely making a point.
I have some notes about how both Lax and Reinhart were reaching for the same insight, but Lax took it a little further - finding a bridge between the "art is art" and "everything else is everything else". I'm been trying to articulate in some way that is intelligible, but haven't gotten there yet.
I had to look up Rublev, did not know of him. Thanks again, this stirs up the mystery some more.
I watched the statement 'art is art' and 'everything else is everything else' being painted on a wall in New York last autumn. Although I new the statement art for art's sake' I was curious for the background of this one. With your blog I found what I was looking for.
ReplyDeleteThe mural painting in-process can be viewed on my blog.
the archetype seems to be a quest for the ultimate; the most real thing...
ReplyDeleteperhaps we can pierce the veil...
ReplyDelete